Why is the European society ignoring the slaughter and the cruelty preformed in Arakan?

The notion that European society is ignoring the slaughter and cruelty in Arakan (Rakhine State) is not entirely accurate. However, there are complexities and challenges in the international response to these issues.

European Union's Response

The European Union has not been silent on the situation in Rakhine State. The EU has issued statements condemning violence and calling for restraint from all parties involved. For instance, the EU welcomed the Myanmar military's unilateral ceasefire in parts of Myanmar and urged its extension to Rakhine State to facilitate a broader peace process1. Additionally, the EU has historically led international efforts on human rights in Myanmar, though there have been criticisms of disunity among member states that can weaken their collective response3.

Challenges in the International Response

1. Disunity Among EU Member States: The EU's ability to respond effectively is sometimes hindered by internal disagreements and differing priorities among its member states. This disunity can lead to a less unified and less effective response to crises like the one in Rakhine State3.

2. Balancing Interests and Values: The EU often faces a dilemma between promoting human rights and maintaining economic or strategic interests. This balance can lead to a perceived lack of strong action against human rights abuses3.

3. Complexity of the Conflict: The situation in Rakhine State is deeply entrenched in historical grievances and involves multiple parties, including the Myanmar military, ethnic armed groups like the Arakan Army, and the Rohingya community. This complexity makes it challenging for external actors to intervene effectively12.

4. International Pressure and Sanctions: While the EU has imposed sanctions and an arms embargo on Myanmar, more robust action is often debated. The effectiveness of these measures in influencing the Myanmar government's actions is a subject of ongoing discussion3.

Human Rights Organizations' Perspectives

Organizations like Amnesty International have been vocal about the atrocities committed in Rakhine State, labeling them as crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing23. These organizations have called for stronger international action, including targeted sanctions and legal accountability for those responsible for the abuses.

In summary, while there are criticisms of the European response to the situation in Rakhine State, it is not accurate to say that European society is entirely ignoring the issue. Instead, there are ongoing efforts to address the crisis, though these efforts are often complicated by internal EU dynamics and the broader geopolitical context.