What are the arguments in favour of/against Jallikattu? What is your personal opinion about it and the way it is being handled by the Centre and SC?

Arguments in Favour of Jallikattu

1. Cultural Significance: Jallikattu is deeply rooted in Tamil Nadu's cultural heritage, dating back to the Tamil classical period (400-100 BCE) and is mentioned in Sangam texts. It is an integral part of the Pongal harvest festival34.
2. Native Breed Conservation: Supporters argue that Jallikattu helps in preserving native breeds like Pulikulam and Kangayam, which are otherwise threatened by mechanized agriculture34.
3. Agrarian Pride: It represents a cultural identity and pride for rural communities, showcasing their strength and the quality of their cattle5.
4. Man-Animal Relationship: Some see it as symbolizing a harmonious relationship between humans and animals4.

Arguments Against Jallikattu

1. Animal Cruelty: Critics argue that Jallikattu is inherently cruel, causing physical and mental suffering to bulls. The Animal Welfare Board of India and organizations like PETA have documented instances of bulls being beaten, poked, and harassed15.
2. Legal Conflict: The Supreme Court initially ruled that Jallikattu violates the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, emphasizing animal welfare over cultural practices12.
3. Colonial Bias: Some argue that the legal framework against Jallikattu reflects a colonial bias, neglecting rural traditions and imposing urban values2.

Handling by the Centre and SC

The Supreme Court has had mixed rulings on Jallikattu. Initially, it banned the practice citing animal cruelty, but later, a Constitution Bench overturned this verdict, allowing Jallikattu as part of Tamil Nadu's cultural heritage45. The Centre has supported amendments to the PCA Act to accommodate cultural practices like Jallikattu, recognizing their cultural significance5.

Personal Opinion: As a neutral observer, it's crucial to balance cultural heritage with animal welfare. While Jallikattu holds significant cultural value, it's essential to ensure that the practice is conducted in a manner that minimizes harm to animals. The Supreme Court's recent stance acknowledges cultural traditions while emphasizing the need for humane treatment of animals. This approach encourages dialogue between cultural preservation and animal rights advocacy.