How come there are no depictions of the massacres Islam inflicted on India?

The lack of widespread depictions of massacres inflicted by Islamic forces on India can be attributed to several factors:

1. Historical Narrative and Bias: Historical accounts often reflect the perspectives of the ruling or dominant groups. In the case of India, the narrative has been influenced by various factors, including colonialism and post-colonial politics. The focus on certain historical events over others can lead to a skewed representation of historical violence2.

2. Sensitivity and Politics: Discussing historical violence, especially when it involves religious or ethnic groups, can be politically sensitive. In India, communal harmony is a significant concern, and highlighting past atrocities might be seen as potentially divisive or inflammatory4.

3. Cultural and Educational Priorities: The emphasis in Indian education and cultural narratives often focuses on national unity, independence movements, and cultural achievements rather than historical conflicts. This can result in a lack of detailed exploration of past massacres in mainstream discourse3.

4. Media and Public Discourse: Media and public discourse in India often prioritize contemporary issues and political debates over historical events. This can limit the visibility of historical massacres in public consciousness5.

5. Academic and Scholarly Perspectives: While there are scholarly works on historical violence, these may not always reach a broad audience. The academic community may discuss these topics extensively, but they might not be widely represented in popular culture or media12.

In summary, the absence of widespread depictions of these massacres is due to a combination of historical, political, and cultural factors that influence how historical events are remembered and discussed in India.